“I’m not conceding that they have a constitutionally protected property right. In fact, that’s my point…that they don’t.”

On February 8, 2012, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (see photos below) heard arguments from the L.A. City Attorney’s Office in its appeal for an overturning of a recent federal court decision that bars the city’s Bureau of Street Services and LAPD from seizing/destroying the property of homeless residents living in Skid Row.

Here are a few selected audio clips that capture the City Attorney Amy Field’s arguments against the preliminary injunction, which include the position that homeless individuals do not “have a constitutionally protected property right.”

Click HERE to hear a full recording of the case.

Today, The Los Angeles Times published an editorial calling City Attorney Trutanich’s ongoing efforts to overturn the injunction “a misguided use of resources.”

The City Attorney’s Office is currently awaiting a response to their appeal. Check back soon as we will be posting the Court of Appeal’s decision as soon as it is released.

Advertisements

One Response to ““I’m not conceding that they have a constitutionally protected property right. In fact, that’s my point…that they don’t.””

  1. […] friends at LA CAN have written about this and collected some of the choice audio from the deliberations in court, set to the music of Billie […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: